MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408039585 · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2025.100860

Accurate estimation of tuber size in large potato throughput at potato storage using machine vision and machine learning techniques

2025· article· en· W4408039585 on OpenAlexafffund
Ighodaro Emwinghare, Ahmad Al-Mallahi, Travis J. Esau, Felipe Campelo

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Agricultural Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThroughputComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningAgricultural engineeringComputer visionEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Machine vision to replace industrial semi-manual grading of potato based on Mask R-CNN was developed. • The machine learning algorithm includes creating seven novel features to distinguish fully visible tubers in clusters. • Detection of fully visible tubers was achieved by implementing random forest, increasing sampling rate by at least 21 folds. • The hardware and software design enabled cost-effective field deployment without compromising accuracy of current practices. In this research work, a machine vision system to sample and measure the lengths of potato tubers was developed and deployed. The proposed system generates information about tuber sizes in real-time and replaces the current practice adopted by the potato industry, which involves costly and labor-intensive activities such as manually sampling potato tubers and passing them under a dedicated laser sensor. The machine vision system, which utilized an RGB camera and a mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN), was able to detect tubers on conveyors under a wide range of light conditions with a sampling accuracy of 90.74 % and a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 93 %. This work also describes 7 novel features to characterize fully tubers detected by the Mask-R-CNN model. These features are used by a Random Forest model to sample at least one and up to five tubers in clusters that ranged between 54 and 231 tubers. The proposed system showed excellent performance in the detection and sampling of tubers, under both static and dynamic conditions, with a worst-case relative root mean square error (nRMSE) value in estimating the long and short diameters of 6.71 and 7.83 %, respectively, in the densely clustered scenarios. The system leverages a graphical processing unit (GPU), which allows the processing of one batch of tubers per second in field, leading to an increase of 21-fold in tuber sampling ability when compared to the current industrial practice, while eliminating the time and labor needed to semi-manually transport and measure tubers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Agricultural TechnologySame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207