MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PARTNERSHIP PEDAGOGY IN GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES, INTEGRATION INTO THE NUS

2024· article· en· W4408042765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonina Danko

Bibliographic record

VenueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Challenges and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPedagogyPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the start of the educational reform in Ukraine, general secondary education institutions under- went transformations, and a final transition to a three-level system took place: primary school, gymnasi- um, and lyceum. At each level, the principles of the New Ukrainian School are gradually being implement- ed. They are aimed at preparing an individual for life in society, forming basic knowledge and skills that will allow them to realize themselves in the future. To form basic competencies in the conditions of a Ukrainian school, it is advisable to study the best practices of other countries, in particular in the formation of partnership skills, which are defined as basic in interaction with others. The purpose of the study is to identify innovations that have been implemented in the NUS by analyz- ing the best practices of partnerships in other countries. The task of the study is to investigate the best practices of partnership pedagogy in countries such as Poland, Germany, Finland, Sweden, identifying the elements that were implemented in the NUS. Research methods are as follows: comparison of the results obtained with the NUS concept, general- ization in the form of conclusions. Partnership pedagogy, as an educational technology, is aimed at involving all participants in the educational process in partnership. Being in close constant cooperation, teachers, parents and children will be able to build an individual educational trajectory for each student, moving along which the child will achieve success. The NUS concept defines 6 basic principles of partnership that must be implemented, which is why there was a need to analyse the best practices of other countries, experience that can be bor- rowed, modified and implemented in the NUS. In the course of educational activities, students not only ac- quire knowledge, but also learn that teachers are partners and mentors, classmates are partners and col- leagues, while parents being partners are mentors, family, and guardians at the same time. The experience of the USA directs the NUS to active interaction with parents. Parents create parent councils, solve a number of issues in the organization of educational activities, but, at the same time, are re- sponsible for the decisions made. The partnership of an educational institution, parents and students in Fin- land shows an example of high mutual trust. Parents completely trust teachers, they do not control the organ- ization of the educational process, do not attend lessons, but are happy to join general extracurricular activi- ties, in which they show partner support for teachers. The experience of Sweden suggests how to educate the future generation to be independent. In this direction, both parents and teachers are more observers, and chil- dren strive for knowledge independently, making efforts to achieve high goals in their own future. The Cana- dian partnership, which is built on constant contact between parents and teachers, suggests how appropri- ate, without imposition and excess, to organize partnership interaction with parents using modern and tra- ditional approaches to transferring information from teachers to parents and from parents to children. But it is interesting that even with constant contact, students are taught independence, responsibility and honesty. Conclusions. Analysing the experience of such countries as Canada, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Nor- way, Poland, etc., we determine the key elements of partnership, the implementation of which in the NUS will allow teachers, students and parents to form partnership skills in compliance with its key principles. These principles include respect for the individual, positive and friendly attitudes, trust in relationships, di- alogue – interaction – mutual respect, distributed leadership, and principles of social partnership. Their im- plementation in the practice of the New Ukrainian School (NUS) offers significant advantages and opens new prospects for reforming Ukraine’s education system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and PsychologySame topicEducational Challenges and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207