MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408042765 · doi:10.32342/3041-2196-2024-2-28-3

PARTNERSHIP PEDAGOGY IN GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES, INTEGRATION INTO THE NUS

2024· article· en· W4408042765 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonina Danko

Notice bibliographique

RevueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEducational Challenges and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeneral partnershipPedagogyPolitical scienceSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

After the start of the educational reform in Ukraine, general secondary education institutions under- went transformations, and a final transition to a three-level system took place: primary school, gymnasi- um, and lyceum. At each level, the principles of the New Ukrainian School are gradually being implement- ed. They are aimed at preparing an individual for life in society, forming basic knowledge and skills that will allow them to realize themselves in the future. To form basic competencies in the conditions of a Ukrainian school, it is advisable to study the best practices of other countries, in particular in the formation of partnership skills, which are defined as basic in interaction with others. The purpose of the study is to identify innovations that have been implemented in the NUS by analyz- ing the best practices of partnerships in other countries. The task of the study is to investigate the best practices of partnership pedagogy in countries such as Poland, Germany, Finland, Sweden, identifying the elements that were implemented in the NUS. Research methods are as follows: comparison of the results obtained with the NUS concept, general- ization in the form of conclusions. Partnership pedagogy, as an educational technology, is aimed at involving all participants in the educational process in partnership. Being in close constant cooperation, teachers, parents and children will be able to build an individual educational trajectory for each student, moving along which the child will achieve success. The NUS concept defines 6 basic principles of partnership that must be implemented, which is why there was a need to analyse the best practices of other countries, experience that can be bor- rowed, modified and implemented in the NUS. In the course of educational activities, students not only ac- quire knowledge, but also learn that teachers are partners and mentors, classmates are partners and col- leagues, while parents being partners are mentors, family, and guardians at the same time. The experience of the USA directs the NUS to active interaction with parents. Parents create parent councils, solve a number of issues in the organization of educational activities, but, at the same time, are re- sponsible for the decisions made. The partnership of an educational institution, parents and students in Fin- land shows an example of high mutual trust. Parents completely trust teachers, they do not control the organ- ization of the educational process, do not attend lessons, but are happy to join general extracurricular activi- ties, in which they show partner support for teachers. The experience of Sweden suggests how to educate the future generation to be independent. In this direction, both parents and teachers are more observers, and chil- dren strive for knowledge independently, making efforts to achieve high goals in their own future. The Cana- dian partnership, which is built on constant contact between parents and teachers, suggests how appropri- ate, without imposition and excess, to organize partnership interaction with parents using modern and tra- ditional approaches to transferring information from teachers to parents and from parents to children. But it is interesting that even with constant contact, students are taught independence, responsibility and honesty. Conclusions. Analysing the experience of such countries as Canada, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Nor- way, Poland, etc., we determine the key elements of partnership, the implementation of which in the NUS will allow teachers, students and parents to form partnership skills in compliance with its key principles. These principles include respect for the individual, positive and friendly attitudes, trust in relationships, di- alogue – interaction – mutual respect, distributed leadership, and principles of social partnership. Their im- plementation in the practice of the New Ukrainian School (NUS) offers significant advantages and opens new prospects for reforming Ukraine’s education system.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,004
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and PsychologyMême sujetEducational Challenges and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207