MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408051557 · doi:10.3390/electronics14050973

Efficient Ensemble of Deep Neural Networks for Multimodal Punctuation Restoration and the Spontaneous Informal Speech Dataset

2025· article· en· W4408051557 on OpenAlexaff
Homayoon Beigi, Xing Yi Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunctuationComputer scienceArtificial neural networkDeep neural networksSpeech recognitionRecurrent neural networkArtificial intelligenceNatural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Punctuation restoration plays an essential role in the postprocessing procedure of automatic speech recognition, but model efficiency is a key requirement for this task. To that end, we present EfficientPunct, an ensemble method with a multimodal time-delay neural network that outperforms the current best model by 1.0 F1 point while using less than a tenth of its network parameters for inference. This work further streamlines a speech recognizer and a BERT implementation to efficiently output hidden layer acoustic embeddings and text embeddings in the context of punctuation restoration. Here, forced alignment and temporal convolutions are used to eliminate the need for attention-based fusion, greatly increasing computational efficiency and improving performance. EfficientPunct sets a new state of the art with an ensemble that weighs BERT’s purely language-based predictions slightly more than the multimodal network’s predictions. Although EfficientPunct shows great promise, from a different perspective, to date, another important challenge in the field has been the fact that punctuation restoration models have been evaluated almost solely on well-structured, scripted corpora. However, real-world ASR systems and postprocessing pipelines typically apply to spontaneous speech with significant irregularities, stutters, and deviations from perfect grammar. To address this important discrepancy, we also introduce SponSpeech, a punctuation restoration dataset derived from informal speech sources, which includes punctuation and casing information. In addition to publicly releasing the dataset, the authors have contributed by providing a filtering pipeline that can be used to generate more data. This filtering pipeline examines the quality of both the speech audio and the transcription text. A challenging test set is also carefully constructed, aimed at evaluating the models’ ability to leverage audio information to predict, otherwise grammatically ambiguous, punctuation. SponSpeech has been made available to the public, along with all code for dataset building and model runs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207