MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408058089 · doi:10.1107/s2053230x25001219

The structure of the <i>Gemella haemolysans</i> M26 IgA1 protease trypsin-like domain

2025· article· en· W4408058089 on OpenAlexafffund
Norman Tran, Jasmina S. Redzic, Elan Eisenmesser, Todd Holyoak

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrypsinProteasesProteaseSerine proteaseEnzymeSerineBiologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) proteases are a group of bacterial-derived enzymes that selectivity hydrolyze human IgA in the hinge region that is unique to this immunoglobulin. Several IgA protease (IgAP) families have evolved this ability using both metalloprotease and serine protease chemical mechanisms. One family of metal-dependent IgAPs is the M26 family. This family can be grouped into two subfamilies based upon the presence or absence of a trypsin-like domain found N-terminal to the IgAP domain. The role of this domain in IgAP structure and function is poorly understood. Here, we present the first structural characterization of an M26 IgAP trypsin-like domain from Gemella haemolysans (GhTrp). These structural data demonstrate that the GhTrp domain possesses a trypsin-like fold but contains significant deviations in the surface-loop structure that is known to be coupled to protease selectivity. The lack of observable catalytic function coupled with the structural data suggest that this domain may exist in a pro-enzyme-like state that can potentially be activated when the domain is N-terminally proteolytically excised from the larger M26 IgAP structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology CommunicationsSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207