Astrocytic cannabinoid receptor 1 promotes resilience by dampening stress-induced blood–brain barrier alterations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood-brain barrier (BBB) alterations contribute to stress vulnerability and the development of depressive behaviors. In contrast, neurovascular adaptations underlying stress resilience remain unclear. Here we report that high expression of astrocytic cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell, particularly in the end-feet ensheathing blood vessels, is associated with resilience during chronic social stress in adult male mice. Viral-mediated overexpression of Cnr1 in astrocytes of the NAc shell results in baseline anxiolytic effects and dampens stress-induced anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in male mice. It promotes the expression of vascular-related genes and reduces astrocyte inflammatory response and morphological changes following an immune challenge with the cytokine interleukin-6, linked to stress susceptibility and mood disorders. Physical exercise and antidepressant treatment increase the expression of astrocytic Cnr1 in the perivascular region in male mice. In human tissue from male donors with major depressive disorder, we observe loss of CNR1 in the NAc astrocytes. Our findings suggest a role for the astrocytic endocannabinoid system in stress responses via modulation of the BBB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".