Nitric Oxide Donor Metallodrug: Single-Inhaler Proposal for Rescue in Acute Allergic Asthma Crises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allergic asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and recurrent bronchial hyperreactivity, highlighting the need for rapid therapeutic interventions during acute crises. This study aimed to assess the potential of a single-dose administration of the ruthenium nitrosyl complex cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PG6)3 (named as FOR811A) as a fast-acting treatment in a murine model of allergic asthma. Female Swiss mice were sensitized with ovalbumin for the induction of asthma and subjected to inhalation challenges. The experimental groups included controls and ovalbumin-sensitized mice receiving FOR811A (0.75 mg/kg) or saline (NaCl 0.9%), both by gavage. Lung tissues were collected for analyses of oxidative damage (nitrite/nitrate and GSH), inflammatory markers (myeloperoxidase, IL-1β, and IL-4), and histological assessment. The results showed that, while FOR811A did not significantly reduce oxidative damage or overall inflammation, it effectively decreased IL-4 levels, indicating a modulation of the Th2 immune response without affecting IL-1β levels (Th1 response). These findings suggest that a single-dose administration of FOR811A may provide a rapid therapeutic effect in allergic asthma crises by promoting smooth muscle relaxation and modulating immune responses. Further research is warranted to explore its clinical utility as a fast-acting rescue medication for acute asthma management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".