MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408073040 · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.025

Patterns of outpatient antibiotic prescribing in older adults by social determinants of healthcare access: a population-based retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4408073040 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mia E Sapin, Colleen J. Maxwell, Anna E. Clarke, Curtis Cooper, Miranda So, Kevin L. Schwartz, Nick Daneman, Sharmistha Mishra, Derek R. MacFadden

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Microbiology and Infection · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalPublic Health OntarioToronto Public HealthUniversity Health NetworkOttawa Public HealthOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaRegional Municipality of WaterlooSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyMedicineHealth careCohortFamily medicineCohort studyGerontologyPopulationEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Strategies to improve antibiotic use may exacerbate health inequities if they do not consider existing barriers to healthcare access. We examined associations between social determinants of healthcare access (SDOH) and antibiotic prescribing and variations in these associations pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged ≥66 years in Ontario, Canada, between March 2018 and March 2020 (pre-pandemic period) and March 2020 and March 2022 (pandemic period). Multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to examine associations between three SDOH variables (neighbourhood-level income and proportion racialized, and individual-level recent immigration) and incident antibiotic prescriptions, accounting for mortality as a competing risk. We assessed for potential effect modification by the pandemic period. RESULTS: The pre-pandemic (n = 2 567 382) and pandemic (n = 2 744 337) cohorts were similar in average age (75 years). Antibiotic prescribing was slightly higher among residents in the highest income neighbourhoods in pre-pandemic (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.04], compared with lowest income) and pandemic (sHR, 1.02 [1.01-1.03]) periods. Prescribing was higher among recent immigrants (vs. long-term residents) in both periods, with a more pronounced difference observed during the pandemic (sHR, 1.21 [1.18-1.25]) than pre-pandemic (sHR, 1.12 [1.09-1.16]) period. Prescribing was lower among residents living in the most diverse neighbourhoods (vs. least diverse) in both periods, with a more pronounced difference during the pandemic (sHR, 0.81 [0.80-0.82]) than pre-pandemic (sHR, 0.92 [0.91-0.93]) period. DISCUSSION: SDOH variables are associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns over time among older outpatients, and the COVID-19 pandemic further modified some of these associations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Microbiology and InfectionSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207