MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408073244 · doi:10.1080/13632469.2025.2470325

Reinforced UHPC-ECC-SCC Shear-Critical Frames Under Lateral Cyclic Loading

2025· article· en· W4408073244 on OpenAlex
Khandaker M. Anwar Hossain, Ali Ehsani Yeganeh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStructural engineeringShear (geology)Materials scienceReinforced concreteComposite materialGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural behaviour of reinforced beam-column frames made with Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC), Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC), and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) without shear reinforcements under lateral cyclic loading is compared based on experimental hysteretic load-displacement/rotation response, concrete/steel strain development, failure modes, crack development, energy dissipation, stiffness degradation, ductility, and viscous damping characteristics. Fiber-reinforced ECC/UHPC highly improved the seismic characteristics of shear-critical frames by exhibiting higher ductility with lower stiffness, better damping with high energy absorbing capacity and ductile joint flexural rather than brittle column shear failure. Code equations should be modified to predict improved shear resistance of ECC/UHPC shear critical frames.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it