Robust self supervised symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization to the graph clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph clustering is a fundamental task in network analysis, aimed at uncovering meaningful groups of nodes based on structural and attribute-based similarities. Traditional Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) methods have shown promise in clustering tasks by providing low-dimensional representations of data. However, most existing NMF-based approaches are highly sensitive to noise and outliers, leading to suboptimal performance in real-world scenarios. Additionally, these methods often struggle to capture the underlying nonlinear structures of complex networks, which can significantly impact clustering accuracy. To address these limitations, this paper introduces Robust Self-Supervised Symmetric NMF (R3SNMF) to improve graph clustering. The proposed algorithm leverages a robust principal component model to handle noise and outliers effectively. By incorporating a self-supervised learning mechanism, R3SNMF iteratively refines the clustering process, enhancing the quality of the learned representations and increasing resilience to data imperfections. The symmetric factorization ensures the preservation of network structures, while the self-supervised approach allows the model to adaptively improve its clustering performance over successive iterations. In addition, R3SNMF integrates a graph-boosting method to improve how relationships within the network are represented. Extensive experimental evaluations on various real-world graph datasets demonstrate that R3SNMF outperforms state-of-the-art clustering methods in terms of both accuracy and robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".