COMPARISON OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PROBLEMS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS WHO PLAY AND DO NOT PLAY GUITAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Musculoskeletal disorders can be observed in many professions, including professional musicians. The aim of this study is to compare musculoskeletal system problems between university students who play guitar as a leisure activity and those who do not. Method: The study included 64 university students aged 18-30, comprising 32 guitar players (guitar players group) and 32 non-guitar players (non-guitar players group). Pain levels of participants were assessed using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), while the physical condition and functionality of their elbows and upper extremities were evaluated using the Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) for musculoskeletal disorders. Results: At the end of the study, differences were found between the two groups in CMDQ data for the back, right knee, and left knee (p
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".