Outcomes of deep brain stimulation surgery in the management of dystonia in glutaric aciduria type 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare autosomal recessive organic acidaemia caused by deficiency of the glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase enzyme. We describe the outcomes following deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the management of dystonia of children and adults with glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1). METHODS: Cases with GA1 were identified from the institutional databases of two tertiary movement disorder services. Data were extracted from clinical records using a standardised proforma, including baseline clinical characteristics, imaging and neurophysiological findings, complications post-surgery, and outcomes as measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BMFDRS) motor scores and the Canadian Occupation Performance Measure (COPM). RESULTS: A total of 15 children were identified aged 3-17.5 with a median age of 11.5 years at neurosurgery, and one adult undergoing DBS aged 31 years. Baseline BMFDRS motor score ranged from 58.5-114, median 105. GMFCS-equivalence level was 5 (i.e. non-ambulant) for 10/16 cases. Surgery was tolerated in all cases without evidence of metabolic decompensation. BFMDRS motor score 1-year post-surgery ranged from 57.5-108.5 (median 97.25) and at last follow-up 57.5-112 (median 104) (no statistically significant change compared to baseline at either time point, P > 0.05). COPM data were available for 11/13 children and young people (CAYP). Clinically significant improvement was reported in 7/11 at 1 year and 8/11 at last follow-up. Four CAYP transitioned to adult services. Death occurred in three cases during follow-up, in no case related to DBS. CONCLUSION: DBS may be considered as a management option for children with GA1 who have appropriately selected goals for intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".