MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408079123 · doi:10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100118

Solar dryers: A review of mechanism, methods and critical analysis of transport models applicable in solar drying of product

2025· review· en· W4408079123 on OpenAlexaff
Onyinyechi Adanma Nnamchi, Cyprian N. Tom, Godwin Akpan, Ibeh Mathew, Linus –Chibuezeh Adindu, Leonard Akuwueke, Stephen Ndubuisi Nnamchi, Augustine Edet Ben, Macmanus Chinenye Ndukwu

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy and Resources · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)Process engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the world transitions towards green energy sources solar drying has become a vital technology for sustainable agricultural production, offering a cleaner, more efficient alternative to traditional drying methods. Solar drying has been demonstrated to be a sustainable and eco-friendly drying process for drying and preserving agricultural products, offering advantages over traditional methods that include faster drying rates, improved product quality, and reduced energy costs. This review examines the mechanisms and methods applicable to solar drying, including indirect and direct solar drying, hybrid systems combining solar drying with other heating sources, and thermal storage materials to address challenges such as intermittent solar radiation. The designs of solar drying systems include various solar collector configurations, drying chamber geometries, and air conveyance mechanisms crucial for efficient drying. This review therefore explores different design approaches and their effects on drying performance, highlighting the importance of understanding the complex interactions between system components. Additionally, the approach for Energy and exergy analysis of solar drying systems was explored, providing insights into energy utilization and efficiency. Finally, this review elucidates the complex transport phenomena governing solar drying, including moisture diffusion, heat and mass transfer, and airflow patterns. It identifies knowledge gaps in existing models and future research directions in transport modelling phenomena to advance sustainable, efficient, and scalable solar drying techniques. • Solar dryer mechanisms and methods for food preservation reviewed. • Overview of direct, indirect, and hybrid solar drying systems provided. • Research on solar collector designs and configurations synthesized. • Key transport phenomena in solar drying discussed. • Knowledge gaps and future research directions in solar drying identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Energy and ResourcesSame topicFood Drying and ModelingFrench-language works237,207