MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408081666 · doi:10.3103/s0145875224700686

The Сanadian Basin (Arctic Ocean): Models of Its Geological Structure, History, and Geodynamics of Formation

2024· article· en· W4408081666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. М. Никишин, Ksenia F. Aleshina, Elizaveta A. Rodina, Irina Artemieva, G. R. Foulger, Henry W. Posamentier

Bibliographic record

VenueMoscow University Geology Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodynamicsGeologyStructural basinArcticThe arcticOceanographyEarth sciencePaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Amerasian and Eurasian basins are distinguished in the Arctic Ocean and are separated by the Lomonosov Ridge. The Canadian Basin, with Cretaceous oceanic and transitional crust, is located in the southern part of the Amerasian Basin. The Alpha-Mendeleev Rise and its associated deep-sea basins (Podvodnikov, Makarov, Toll, Nautilus, and Stefansson) lie to the north of the Canadian Basin. The Alpha-Mendeleev Rise and associated basins have continental crust that has been altered to varying degrees. Their major formation occurred about 125–90 Ma. We discuss three models for the formation of the Canadian Basin. Model-1: the entire Amerasian Basin with the oceanic and transitional crust was formed first (before 125 Ma). The Alpha-Mendeleev Rise region was then formed on the earlier oceanic crust as a volcanic formation (125–90 Ma). Model-2: the Canadian Basin formed first (before 125 Ma). The Alpha-Mendeleev Rise area and associated basins were then formed due to the significant transtension of the continental crust and magmatism (125–90 Ma). Model-3: The Alpha-Mendeleev rise area and associated basins formed first above a mantle plume (125–100 Ma). Subsequently, along one of the branches of continental rifting, spreading of the transitional and oceanic crust began and the Canadian Basin was formed (100–70 Ma). We find Model-1 to be the least probable, because it is now proven that the Alpha-Mendeleev Rise is underlain by continental crust. Model-2 and Model-3 are both possible. According to these models, the Canadian Basin formed as a backarc basin of the Pacific subduction zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoscow University Geology BulletinSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207