Pediatric cerebrospinal fluid immune profiling distinguishes pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis from other pediatric-onset acute neurological disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides a unique glimpse into the central nervous system (CNS) compartment and offers insights into immune processes associated with both healthy immune surveillance as well as inflammatory disorders of the CNS. The latter include demyelinating disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), that warrant different therapeutic approaches yet are not always straightforward to distinguish on clinical and imaging grounds alone. Here, we establish a comprehensive phenotypic landscape of the pediatric CSF immune compartment across a range of non-inflammatory and inflammatory neurological disorders, with a focus on better elucidating CNS-associated immune mechanisms potentially involved in, and discriminating between, pediatric-onset MS (MS) and other pediatric-onset suspected neuroimmune disorders, including MOGAD. We find that CSF from pediatric patients with non-inflammatory neurological disorders is primarily composed of non-activated CD4+ T cells, with few if any B cells present. CSF from pediatric patients with acquired inflammatory demyelinating disorders is characterized by increased numbers of B cells compared to CSF of both patients with other inflammatory or non-inflammatory conditions. Certain features, including particular increased frequencies of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) and decreased frequencies of CD14+ myeloid cells, distinguish MS from MOGAD and other acquired inflammatory demyelinating disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".