DIREITO E OUTRAS MÍDIAS: ASPECTOS JURÍDICOS EXTRAÍDOS DE OBRAS DE FICÇÃO NO CINEMA, NA TELEVISÃO E NA LITERATURA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little explored yet, the dialogue between law and art are important for improvement, democratization and the encouragement of debate and legal analyzes for different audiences for legal education.Approved and suitable opportunities presented by cinema broadening an understanding of what human rights are and how important they are to the dignity and the protection of legal interests of the various peoples.Noting that one function of art is to provoke reflections allow a break established paradigms, enable an experience of other realities are in understanding movies human rights beyond the academic.The groups with the demands in its present involve the need to protect immigrants and refugees in the political and social engagement, are always valid for the effective protection of human rights of refugees within the international protection system.As a backdrop to the analysis of refugee rights is used the film "District 9," a science fiction film with thriller elements, produced in 2009 by New Zealand, USA, South Africa and Canada.A work deals with issues involving xenophobia, racial segregation, violence and exploitation against refugee community.The film uses symbolic and literally an alien race parking on Johannesburg (South Africa) and is received as refugees.The "shock" the world on a group vulnerability passes with time, giving space to all forms of abuse.But these are refugees human rights holders?The work presents a range of topics for Human Rights Education, including forced migration, refugees, established outsiders, avoidance and social empathy.The unfolding of the plot is rich to demonstrate a need for recognition of the other as a "person" for the achievement of human dignity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it