MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408086389 · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.08

A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Technology Use: The Role of Confirmation and Perceived Usefulness in the Hospital X Management Information System in Padang

2025· article· en· W4408086389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nurmaines Adhyka, Tosi Rahmaddian, Bun Yurizali, Ramadoni Ramadoni, Yolanda Putri Wulandani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptual modelBusinessKnowledge managementPsychologyProcess managementComputer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective: The adoption and use of Management Information Systems (MIS) in healthcare settings, like Hospital X in Padang, are crucial for improving operational efficiencies and patient care. Task-Technology Fit (TTF) measures how well technology supports its intended tasks and significantly influences user satisfaction and system use continuity. Key factors include Confirmation, assessing post-adoption user expectations, and Perceived Usefulness (PU), evaluating job performance enhancement. This study explores TTF's impact on Continuance Intention (CI), mediated by Confirmation and PU, within Hospital X's MIS context. Methods: Data were gathered from staff at H.B. Saanin Mental Hospital, one of West Sumatera's public hospitals. A total of 158 questionnaires were distributed, with 150 deemed analyzable using structural equation modeling. Result: The study finds no statistically significant relationship between TTF and PU. However, a marginally significant relationship between TTF and Confirmation suggests modest evidence that alignment between tasks and technology influences users' confirmation of their expectations. Notably, PU does not directly impact CI within Hospital X's MIS, nor does Confirmation significantly affect users' intention to continue using the system. Overall, the direct influence of technology-task alignment on users' intention to continue using MIS is inconclusive in this study context. Conclution: This study reveals complex relationships among TTF, Confirmation, PU, and CI within Hospital X's MIS framework. Despite the theoretical significance of TTF and Confirmation, their direct impacts on PU and users' intention to continue system use are not statistically significant. These findings emphasize the ongoing need to evaluate and adapt MIS strategies to better align with user needs and ensure sustained effectiveness in healthcare operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207