MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408086553 · doi:10.36985/he0w0s90

Analisis Spasial Kesesuaian Fungsi Kawasan Sub Daerah Aliran Sungai Aek Pohon Dengan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Panyabungan)

2025· article· id· W4408086553 on OpenAlexaff
Edy Syahputra Batubara, Jef Rudiantho Saragih, Tioner Purba

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Regional Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sungai Aek Pohon merupakan bagian tengah dari DAS Batang Gadis. Bertambah luasnya kawasan terbangun dan maraknya penambangan galian golongan c di lokasi ini dikhawatirkan akan mengakibatkan berkurangnya fungsi kawasan Daerah aliran sungai (DAS) Batang Gadis, khususnya Sub DAS Aek Pohon sebagai kawasan konservasi dan ketersediaan ruang terbuka hijau dan fasilitas pelayanan umum dan tidak sesuainya dengan Rencana Tata Ruang Mandailing Natal. Tujuan dari Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi sebaran dan fungsi lahan dan kesesuaian fungsi lahan Sub DAS Aek Pohon yang berada pada Kecamatan Panyabungan terhadap RTRW Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemanfaatan lahan Sub DAS Aek Pohon di Kecamatan Panyabungan didominasi sektor pertanian dengan luas 82,9% dari total luas lahan. Sektor ini meliputi sawah, perkebunan, ladang, kolam, kebun campuran dan hutan. Penggunaan lahan lainnya untuk pemukiman seluas 7,9 %, industri dan perdagangan seluas 1,3 % dan sisanya semak belukar dan sungai. Kesesuaian lahan di Sub DAS Aek Pohon pada Kecamatan Panyabungan terhadap Rencana Tata Ruang dan Wilayah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal memiliki dua kategori kesesuaian yaitu tinggi seluas 900,14 Ha, dengan pemanfaatan yang sesuai berupa pengembangan perkotaan, dan katagori kesesuaian lahan sedang dengan luas lahan sebesar 827,46 Ha, sesuai untuk kegiatan konservasi lahan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Regional PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207