MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408089620 · doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000001086

Biomarker discovery in psoriatic disease

2025· review· en· W4408089620 on OpenAlexaff
Darshini Ganatra, Vinod Chandran

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriatic arthritisBiomarkerPsoriasisDiseasePopulationBiomarker discoveryOncologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineImmunologyProteomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Psoriasis, a chronic skin condition, characterized by scaly erythematous plaques, is prevalent in around 2% of the population. Around 25% of psoriasis patients have psoriatic arthritis (PsA), an inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that often leads to progressive joint damage and disability. Psoriatic diseases (PsD) encompassing psoriasis and PsA, are often associated with pathophysiologically related conditions like uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease as well as comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease. Due to the heterogeneous nature of PsD, diagnosis and treatment is a challenge. Biomarkers can objectively measure variables, such as disease state, disease progress, and treatment outcomes, thus offering the possibility for better management of disease. This review focuses on some of the biomarker research that was carried out in PsD in the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: Diverse biomarker types ranging from SNPs, mRNA, proteins, metabolites and immune cell profiles have been categorized as per the Biomarkers, EndpointS and other Tools (BEST) resource developed by the FDA/NIH. Some of the latest research has focused on multiomic assays and these along with advanced bioinformatic tools can help in better disease management. SUMMARY: Recent developments in PsA biomarker research show promise in identifying markers that can help in diagnosis, assess disease activity and predict treatment response. However, most studies are in the early discovery and verification state. Large-scale studies to replicate findings and develop and validate predictive algorithms are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in RheumatologySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207