MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408089630 · doi:10.1002/brb3.70387

Cognitive Function Deficits Associated With Type 2 Diabetes and Retinopathy: Volumetric Brain MR Imaging Study

2025· article· en· W4408089630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ece Özdemir Öktem, Dila Sayman, Sevilay Ayyıldız, Çağlar Öktem, Lütfiye İpek, Behçet Ayyıldız, Fatih Aslan, Emin Utku Altındal, Nilay Yağcı, Rumeysa Dikici, Ramazan Karaca, Şeyda Çankaya, Seda Avnioğlu, Halil Aziz Velioglu, Burak Yuluğ

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType 2 diabetesMedicineDiabetic retinopathyRetinopathyNeuroimagingCognitionBrain functionBrain sizeDiabetes mellitusNeuroscienceMagnetic resonance imagingPsychologyRadiologyEndocrinologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a ubiquitous chronic inflammatory disease with deleterious effects on various tissues, including the kidney, retina, and peripheral nerves. Studies using histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging have revealed that diabetes-related chronic hyperglycemia may impact the brain's essential functioning by causing microvascular damage. The aim of this study was to examine the cognitive functioning of type 2 diabetic individuals with and without retinopathy by evaluating their morphological, structural, and biochemical differences. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, education level, type of diabetes mellitus (DM), disease duration, treatment received, other diabetic complications, such as nephropathy and neuropathy, and detailed medical histories were recorded. All participants underwent an extensive neuropsychological examination with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) testing. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate gray matter volume differences between the groups. RESULTS: Gray matter volume differences between the groups were observed. Differences were observed after multiple corrections (age, education, and total intracranial volume [TIV]). First, the diabetic retinopathy group exhibited a significantly smaller gray matter volume in the right inferior temporal gyrus than the diabetic group (p = 0.032). In addition, the diabetic retinopathy group exhibited a significantly smaller gray matter volume than the control group in the right insula (lateral and central part) (p = 0.011). In addition, MoCA scores exhibited significant correlation with the two regions emerging as statistically significant in our analyses (the right inferior temporal gyrus and right insula) (p = 0.003, p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the presence of a neurodegenerative process associated with cognitive dysfunction that is particularly prominent in the retinopathy stage of DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207