MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408095733 · doi:10.1007/s10765-025-03530-8

Experimental Thermal Conductivity Measurements for the Hydrofluoroolefin R1225ye(Z)

2025· article· en· W4408095733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Giulia Lombardo, Davide Menegazzo, Laura Vallese, Mauro Scattolini, Sergio Bobbo, Laura Fedele

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal conductivityMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the pursuit of a fourth generation of refrigerants characterized by zero Ozone Depletion Potential and remarkably low Global Warming Potential (GWP), as mandated by EU Regulation No 517/2014 and the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, natural refrigerants and hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) have emerged as the most promising long-term alternatives. Notably, the hydrofluoroolefin cis-1,2,3,3,3-pentafluoroprop-1-ene R1225ye(Z) and its isomers have been considered as environmentally friendly options to replace the widely used R410A in refrigeration applications, both in pure form and blends, due to their similar characteristic pressures and temperatures. However, despite its GWP being lower than 3, studies on the toxicological effects of R1225ye(Z) have prevented its applications in industrial contexts, discouraging the study of its thermophysical properties. To date, the available literature offers only a limited amount of experimental data on the thermophysical properties of R1225ye(Z), with none specifically addressing its thermal conductivity. Thus, this study addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive dataset of 68 experimental thermal conductivity measurements, performed employing a double transient hot-wire apparatus along eleven isotherms spanning temperatures from 243.15 to 343.15 K, encompassing pressures ranging from close to vapor pressure up to 8 MPa. A simplified correlation for estimating the thermal conductivity at saturation state was developed using the extrapolation method. Then, the experimental thermal conductivity data were compared with a generalized model for liquid thermal conductivity in HFOs, demonstrating good agreement with calculated values (AAD 2.3%), in line with the declared model accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ThermophysicsSame topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207