Inclusive policies in performing arts: a case study of Chile's approach to disability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of cultural policies on performing arts attendance among individuals with disabilities in Chile, highlighting how accessibility, sociodemographic factors, and institutional practices shape cultural participation. Drawing on data from the 2017 National Survey of Cultural Participation in Chile (N = 12,151), this research employs quantitative analysis to explore barriers faced by people with disabilities. Our findings underscore the limited efficacy of current policies in promoting inclusivity within the performing arts sector in Chile. We argue that without targeted policy reforms aimed at improving accessibility and fostering inclusivity, cultural institutions will continue to marginalize individuals with disabilities. The study contributes to the discourse on inclusive policy, advocating for systemic changes to create equitable opportunities for cultural engagement and strengthen the commitment to diversity and inclusion within Chile's cultural landscape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it