MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408104064 · doi:10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100490

X-ray tomo-ptychography of single micrometric carbon and basalt fibres

2025· article· en· W4408104064 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarbon Trends · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasaltPtychographyX-rayCarbon fibersMaterials scienceOpticsGeologyCrystallographyChemistryPhysicsGeochemistryComposite materialDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon fibre-based composite materials are essential for emissions reduction in transportation. However, the physical properties of their main component, i.e. the micro-size carbon fibres, are still poorly documented because of experimental difficulties. Such material is however known for presenting high anisotropy between off- and on-axis properties. Here we have used Ptychography X-ray Computed Tomography to probe quantitatively the bulk electronic density and the morphology of micrometric carbon and basalt fibres. The carbon fibre exhibits a density variation as function of its radius, with a maximum at its center and a minimum around half of the radius, while the basalt fibre is homogeneous. Morphology is investigated at the fibre scale to quantify its deviations from a perfect cylinder and at the nanoscale to evaluate the texture of the surface. Resolutions are around 200 nm. This pioneering work should open new understandings and bulk or surface experimentations on single micron-size fibres at the nanoscale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it