MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408107946 · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.116012

Sustainable granular materials improve removal of natural organic matter, turbidity and microplastics during adsorption, ballasted flocculation and granular filtration

2025· article· en· W4408107946 on OpenAlexafffund
Mathieu Lapointe, Heidi Jahandideh, Olubukola S. Alimi, Jeffrey M. Farner, Nathalie Tufenkji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of environmental chemical engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoagulation and Flocculation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of AlbertaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesÉcole de technologie supérieureCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsMicroplasticsFlocculationFiltration (mathematics)TurbidityAdsorptionOrganic matterNatural organic matterEnvironmental scienceGranular materialChemistryWaste managementChemical engineeringPulp and paper industryEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialGeologyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-use metal-based coagulants, high molecular weight flocculants, engineered adsorbents, and porous media are key materials for several processes in water treatment. However, many of these materials are often expensive, unsustainable, and can increase the amount of sludge produced during the water treatment process. Moreover, the accumulation of toxic metals and synthetic flocculants limits sludge reusability as a fertilizer in agriculture. Herein, we propose reusable, low-cost and sustainable modified grains that can be simultaneously used as positively charged adsorbents to improve removal of soluble matter (natural organic matter), and ballast media to improve removal of particulate matter (turbidity or total suspended solids). Three different starting materials were used to synthesize these modified grains: pristine sand, recycled crushed glass, and grit extracted from a wastewater treatment plant, all of which were grafted with iron (hydr)oxides (Fe surface coverage of 13 and 81%, synthesized with 0.02 and 2 M Fe, respectively). The modified grains were then employed as (i) adsorbents to remove natural organic matter, (ii) ballast media during flocculation to increase floc size and density, and (iii) filtration media for simultaneous removal of natural organic matter and turbidity. Compared to conventional treatment alone (coagulation and flocculation), the incorporation of modified grains simultaneously used as adsorbents and ballast media increased removal of natural organic matter (up to 16%), microplastics (up to 92%), and turbidity (< 1 NTU, with settling rate 18 times faster). Ultimately, modified grains could be used in existing ballasted flocculation processes – replacing conventional sand – to provide an additional NOM removal. Iron-grafted sand, glass, and grit – simultaneously used as adsorbent and ballast media – reduced the settling duration by 18 times compared to conventional treatment (without iron-grafted media) and increased removal of natural organic matter (up to 23%) and microplastics (up to 92%). • Three different starting materials were used to synthesize Fe-coated grains. • Fe surface area coverage of 81% was obtained. • Modified grains were employed as adsorbents and ballast media • Modified grains media increased removal of microplastics (up to 92%). • Modified grains could be used in flocculation processes to provide NOM removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of environmental chemical engineeringSame topicCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesFrench-language works237,207