MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heterogeneity in Treatment Effects in the Reduction of Dietary Sodium to Less Than 100 mmol in Heart Failure (SODIUM-HF): A Secondary Post Hoc Analysis

2025· article· en· W4408108599 on OpenAlexafffund
Fernando G. Zampieri, Sarah Rathwell, Finlay A. McAlister, Heather J. Ross, Jorge Escobedo, Clara Saldarriaga, Eloisa Colin-Ramírez, Richard W. Troughton, Peter S. Macdonald, Wendimagegn Alemayehu, Justin A. Ezekowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiac Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreAlberta HealthUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
FundersHealth Research Council of New ZealandCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity Hospital Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePost-hoc analysisHeart failureSodiumInternal medicineMoleReduction (mathematics)Post hocCardiologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: SODIUM-HF (Study of Dietary Intervention of Sodium Under100 mmol in Heart Failure) compared usual care with dietary sodium restriction in patients with heart failure (HF) and produced neutral results for the primary endpoint. Heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTE) analysis could enhance the original findings. OBJECTIVE: Explore the presence of HTE in the SODIUM-HF trial using a risk-effect-based approach. METHODS: HTE was assessed using a risk-based approach based on the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic (MAGGIC) HF risk score. Interaction between MAGGIC quartiles and outcomes was assessed using a Bayesian regression model with neutral priors. The primary endpoint was the same for the original trial (composite of cardiovascular-related admission to hospital, cardiovascular-related emergency department visit, or all-cause death within 12 months in the intention-to-treat population); KCCQ was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Were included 806 patients. MAGGIC quartiles used for the risk-based analyses were 0.036 to 0.102 (low), >0.102 to 0.147 (medium-low), >0.147 to 0.209 (medium-high), and >0.209 to 0.591 (high). There was very strong evidence for the interaction between MAGGIC quartile and intervention (Bayes factor of 68). There was a strong suggestion of association between intervention arm and a lower occurrence of the primary endpoint for the medium-low MAGGIC quartile (>0.98 probability), and a suggestion that the intervention was associated with more frequent occurrence of the primary endpoint in the high MAGGIC quartile (probability of benefit of 0.06). Suggestion of HTE was also found for KCCQ with a strong suggestion of benefit for the intervention for those in the lowest MAGGIC quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: HTE effects in the SODIUM-HF trial is probable. Further trials in sodium retention may benefit by incorporating this information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.092
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.092
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.032
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiac FailureSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207