MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408116392 · doi:10.1089/respcare.12597

Invasive Respiratory Support in Critical Pediatric Asthma

2025· review· en· W4408116392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher J. L. Newth, Patrick A. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the United States and Canada, severe asthma requiring mechanical ventilation has declined over the past decade reflecting a rise in noninvasive therapies. When aggressive noninvasive therapies fail, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are lifesaving and should be planned for in advance. As speed is important, the most experienced practitioner should intubate and rapid correction of hypercarbia and respiratory acidosis should be avoided. An elevated minute ventilation may cause pulmonary hyperinflation leading to air-leak syndrome and/or hemodynamic instability. Patients with severe air flow obstruction in asthma typically have near-normal respiratory system compliance. Therefore, an increase in plateau pressure (P plat ) usually reflects dynamic hyperinflation. A suggested upper limit for P plat is 25–30 cm H 2 O. Intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) is measured with an expiratory hold and is valuable in that PEEP set on the ventilator can be lower than PEEPi. A reasonable ventilation strategy involving low ventilator rates and PEEP without quick correction of blood gases should be adopted. Alternative modalities to conventional mechanical ventilation are limited and unless very experienced with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, the risk likely outweighs benefit. Heliox may be beneficial but cannot be delivered by every ventilator and this varies by manufacturer. Inhaled anesthetics are direct bronchodilators and likely beneficial but as no conventional ICU ventilator can deliver them, close cooperation with Anesthesiology is needed. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy that is particularly useful in cases of severe air-leak syndrome. As with mechanical ventilation, ECMO does not reverse the asthma disease process but allows support of the patient until there is improvement with other therapies. Most children who die experience cardiac arrest prior to hospitalization. Otherwise, most mechanically ventilated children survive to hospital discharge but there is a suggestion of additional mortality from asthma in the following decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207