AI-Driven Computational Frameworks: Advancing Edge Intelligence and Smart Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Edge Computing are transforming modern computing paradigms by enabling real-time processing, low-latency decision-making, and enhanced intelligence in smart systems. This paper presents an AI-driven computational framework that integrates Edge Intelligence (EI) with adaptive deep learning models to optimize data processing and decision-making at the edge. The proposed framework employs federated learning, neuromorphic computing, and reinforcement learning-based optimization to improve efficiency, security, and scalability in distributed edge environments. Key components include lightweight AI models for energy-efficient edge inference, privacy-preserving techniques using homomorphic encryption and blockchain, and self-learning architectures for adaptive real-time analytics. The study evaluates the framework’s performance in diverse applications, including smart healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and industrial IoT, demonstrating significant improvements in computational efficiency, network resilience, and response time compared to traditional cloud-based architectures. Comprehensive simulations and real-world case studies validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach, showing a 35% reduction in latency, a 30% increase in energy efficiency, and a 50% improvement in decision accuracy in edge-enabled smart systems. This research highlights the critical role of AI-driven computational frameworks in advancing next-generation intelligent computing, paving the way for autonomous, secure, and efficient edge-based smart environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".