MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408117336 · doi:10.29333/ejgm/16073

Interdisciplinary approach in ophthalmic trigeminal neuralgia: A case report

2025· article· en· W4408117336 on OpenAlexaff
Ada María González-González, Xabier Soto-Goñi, Fadi Hallal-Peche, Eleuterio A. Sánchez Romero

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of General Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrigeminal neuralgiaMedicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Introduction:</b> Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe pain disorder characterized by electric shock-like cramps and facial pain that is often triggered by innocuous stimuli. TN can be classified as classical, secondary, or idiopathic, with classical TN involving the vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve root. It is more prevalent in women and typically affects the right side of the face.<br /> <b>Case presentation:</b> A 38-year-old woman with persistent right facial pain experienced paroxysms near her right eye leading to headaches. Her medical history included treatment with carbamazepine, amitriptyline, eslicarbamazepine, and sertraline, but symptoms persisted. Diagnostic assessments included physical examinations, laboratory tests, and imaging. Hypersensitivity and allodynia were observed in the trigeminal nerve branches, and a magnetic resonance imaging revealed vascular contact and an arachnoid cyst in 2023.<br /> <b>Results:</b> Despite multiple pharmacological treatments and rehabilitation, the patient’s condition remained chronic with recurrent symptoms. The pharmacological therapies included pregabalin, baclofenac, topiramate, and botulinum toxin. Rehabilitation involved biobehavioral approaches and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy. Owing to the persistent symptoms, microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery was advised. Partial improvement was noted in allodynia and sensitivity to rehabilitation; however, paroxysmal symptoms persisted.<br /> <b>Discussion:</b> This case illustrates the importance of a comprehensive multimodal approach to managing TN by integrating pharmacological, rehabilitative, and surgical interventions. The variability in treatment responses poses significant challenges. The literature supports MVD for TN with clear neurovascular compression and highlights the role of rehabilitation as an effective adjunct treatment. Patient experience underscores the potential benefits of rehabilitation and the critical role of imaging in guiding surgical decisions. This approach highlights the necessity for tailored treatment plans in complex TN cases despite challenges in symptom management and treatment adherence.<br /> <b>Conclusions:</b> Rehabilitation, along with pharmaceutical therapy, can be good adjuvant treatment for ophthalmic neuralgia. Regarding the final treatment performed from a medical perspective, MVD is considered the first-line surgical procedure for patients with a clear neurovascular compression etiology determined by imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Journal of General MedicineSame topicTrigeminal Neuralgia and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207