MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tecnologias patriarcais: uma revisão sistemática sobre a alienação parental

2025· article· pt· W4408118127 on OpenAlex
Camila Costa Cardeal, Alessandra Abrahão Costa, Lara Maria Alves Falcão, Ludmila Ribeiro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Estudos Feministas · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: A proposta deste texto é compreender como a produção acadêmica nacional define e operacionaliza a “alienação parental”. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura por meio do método PRISMA, abrangendo 199 publicações sobre o tema até janeiro de 2023. A análise revela que esse dispositivo busca promover uma “tecnologia da não violência” (Patrice SCHUCH, 2013), por meio da intervenção judicial na família. No entanto, essa abordagem tem reverberado (i) no enquadramento de interações familiares como patológicas, (ii) na violência de gênero dirigida a mulheres que não representam o papel de mãe dentro das molduras patriarcais, para além (iii) do esquecimento da criança ou adolescente como sujeito de direitos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it