MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408122333 · doi:10.3390/electronics14051016

Joint Task Offloading and Resource Scheduling in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Edge Computing Networks

2025· article· en· W4408122333 on OpenAlexaff
Jinhong Li, Rong Chai, Kang’An Gui, Chengchao Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow earth orbitSatelliteComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Joint (building)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTask (project management)Real-time computingAerospace engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringSystems engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In view of the future of the Internet of Things (IoT), the number of edge devices and the amount of sensing data and communication data are expected to increase exponentially. With the emergence of new computing-intensive tasks and delay-sensitive application scenarios, terminal devices need to offload new business computing tasks to the cloud for processing. This paper proposes a joint transmission and offloading task scheduling strategy for the edge computing-enabled low Earth orbit satellite networks, aiming to minimize system costs. The proposed system model incorporates both data service transmission and computational task scheduling, which is framed as a long-term cost function minimization problem with constraints. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed strategy can significantly reduce the average system cost, queue length, energy consumption, and task completion rate, compared to baseline strategies, thus highlighting the strategy’s effectiveness and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207