MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408125665 · doi:10.18778/8142-320-5.18

Wpływ deportacji Akadian na estetykę i poetykę francuskojęzycznego teatru w Kanadzie

2019· book-chapter· en· W4408125665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sebastian Zacharow

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article has two goals. The first goal is to present a historical process which forced theCanadians to become a minority towards the British and to show the complicated relationshipsin which these two nationalities had to live after the numerous wars waged inNorth America between the British Crown and the Kingdom of France. The second goalis to show the evolution of the aesthetics of the francophone Canadian theater beingthe result of the Acadian’s deportation. In this context, three theatrical plays, which aredramatic texts representative of various stages of the difficult Acadian-Canadian history,will be used as examples: Le Théâtre de Neptune (1609) as a representative of the theater of the period of the French dominance in the New France; Le Drame du peuple acadien(1930) as a stage in the poetics of the Acadian martyrology; and La martyrdom Saguine(1971), depicting the aesthetics influenced by the Quiet Revolution, where Acadiabecomes a nostalgic place, in a way an open-air museum, where thoughts are returnedwithout a tormenting sense of injustice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooksSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207