Pengaruh Kesepian terhadap Quarter Life Crisis pada Emerging Adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Loneliness is a condition where an individual feels that their social relationships aren’t as expected. In emerging adulthood phase, loneliness becomes a factor that worsens the quarter life crisis (QLC), where the demands and anxiety of social relationships are one of the main causes. This study aims to determine the role of loneliness on QLC in emerging adulthood in Bandung City with N = 409 respondents. This study uses a quantitative causality design, with convenience sampling techniques and questionnaires distributed online. The measuring instruments used were the UCLA Loneliness Scale 3 adapted by Ramadhani (2023), with reliability value of 0.931 and the QLC-Scale measuring instrument adapted by Afandi et.al (2023) with reliability value of 0.913. The results of the simple regression analysis test showed that the calculated t-value was 9.209> t-table 1.966, which means that there is a positive influence between loneliness on QLC with an R2 value of 0.172, which means that 17.2% of loneliness affects QLC in emerging adulthood in Bandung, while 82.8% influenced by other factors. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the higher the level of loneliness, the higher the level of a person's QLC, and vice versa. Abstrak. Kesepian adalah kondisi individu merasa hubungan sosialnya tidak sesuai yang diharapkan. Pada fase emerging adulthood, kesepian menjadi faktor yang memperburuk quarter life crisis (QLC), dimana tuntutan dan kecemasan hubungan sosial menjadi salah satu penyebab utama terjadinya krisis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran kesepian terhadap QLC pada emerging adulthood di Kota Bandung dengan N=409 responden. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif kausalitas, dengan teknik convenience sampling dan kuesioner dibagikan secara online. Alat ukur yang digunakan yakni UCLA Loneliness Scale version 3 diadaptasi oleh Ramadhani (2023), dengan nilai reliabilitas sebesar 0.931 dan alat ukur QLC-Scale yang diadaptasi oleh Afandi et. al (2023) dengan nilai reliabilitas 0.913. Hasil uji analisis regresi sederhana menunjukkan bahwa nilai t hitung sebesar 9.209 > t tabel 1.966 yang artinya terdapat pengaruh positif antara kesepian terhadap QLC dengan nilai R2 sebesar 0,172 yang artinya sebesar 17,2% kesepian berpengaruh terhadap QLC pada emerging adulthood di Kota Bandung, sedangkan 82,8% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lainnya. Berdasarkan hasil uji analisis regresi sederhana, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa semakin tinggi tingkat kesepian maka tingkat QLC seseorang akan semakin tinggi. Sebaliknya, semakin rendah tingkat kesepian seseorang, maka tingkat QLC akan semakin rendah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".