Sensory nerve-secreted factors regulate basal keratinocyte function <i>in vitro</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synopsis Basal keratinocytes in the skin epidermis respond to microenvironmental signals during homeostatic maintenance of the skin and following injury by proliferating, migrating, and differentiating to restore the epidermal barrier. Injuries to the skin can result in non-healing wounds, characterized by prolonged inflammation, failure to close, and chronic pain. The skin is densely innervated by peripheral sensory nerves, which contribute to the wound repair response. Although it is known that nerves are important for successful wound healing, the underlying cellular mechanisms of this phenomenon, and particularly the role of nerves in directing keratinocyte re-epithelialization, are poorly understood. To explore the relationship between sensory nerves and keratinocyte function in vitro, we cultured keratinocytes with conditioned media collected from dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in both homeostatic and post-wounding conditions and found that keratinocyte migration, proliferation, and phenotype, functions essential for re-epithelialization, were modulated by DRG conditioned media. Using a proteomic approach, we characterized the secretome of cultured DRG and identified key factors essential for wound healing, including extracellular matrix proteins, growth factors, and metabolic factors involved with ATP production, which was correlated with alternations in keratinocyte metabolism when cultured in DRG conditioned medium. Our results advance our understanding of the microenvironmental cues that direct keratinocyte function during normal cellular turnover and cutaneous wound healing in vitro, helping to drive the development of therapeutics that target dysregulated re-epithelialization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it