MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408145514 · doi:10.1109/tns.2025.3547998

High-Resolution Cr/4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Radiation Detector

2025· article· en· W4408145514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Sciences Centre Research FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDetectorParticle detectorMaterials scienceSchottky barrierOptoelectronicsSilicon carbideResolution (logic)RadiationRadiation hardeningSchottky diodePhysicsOpticsComputer scienceDiode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present the first comprehensive analysis of radiation detection using chromium (Cr) as the Schottky barrier contact on n-type 4H-silicon carbide (4H-SiC) epitaxial layers tailored for high-performance applications in extreme environments. The Cr/4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode (SBD) is evaluated across several critical metrics, including junction properties, radiation response, and defect characteristics, and is compared with SBDs utilizing other refractory metals such as molybdenum (Mo), palladium (Pd), and nickel (Ni) on analogous 4H-SiC epilayers. Despite the lower work function of Cr, 4.5 eV, compared to the other metals, the Cr/4H-SiC SBDs demonstrated exceptional rectification behavior, achieving a barrier height of 1.13 eV and a low leakage current of 6.7 nA at −100 V reverse bias. These characteristics are ideal for high-resolution radiation detection applications. The Cr/4H-SiC SBD exhibited an impressive energy resolution of 0.5% at an optimized bias of −40 V when exposed to 5486-keV alpha particles. Notably, in self-biased mode (0 V applied bias), the device delivered an energy resolution of 2.3% and a charge collection efficiency (CCE) of 73%, surpassing the performance of benchmark Ni/4H-SiC SBDs. Capacitance-mode deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) analysis revealed the presence of key deep-level defects, including Z<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}_{1/2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and EH5 trap centers, and titanium substitutional defects. Among these, the Z<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}_{1/2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> trap center, widely regarded as a lifetime-killer, was found to play a significant role in influencing the detector’s performance. The findings in this article highlight the untapped potential of Cr/4H-SiC SBDs for high-efficiency, self-biased radiation detection in harsh environments, such as nuclear reactors and space exploration missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it