MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408145807 · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00113

Empowering Tuberculosis Screening with Explainable Self-Supervised Deep Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4408145807 on OpenAlex
Neel Patel, Alexander Wong, Ashkan Ebadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkDeep neural networksTuberculosisMachine learningMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis remains a global health crisis, disproportionately affecting resource-limited populations and remote regions, with over 10 million new infections annually. Though curable, early detection is crucial. Chest X-rays are the primary screening tool, but their use requires skilled radiologists, often unavailable in underserved areas. This highlights the need for AI-powered systems to assist in rapid screening. However, training reliable AI models requires large-scale, high-quality data, which is costly and challenging to obtain. To address this, we introduce an explainable self-supervised learning network for tuberculosis screening, achieving 98.14% accuracy, with recall and precision rates of 95.72% and 99.44%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207