MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408151160 · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2465001

COVID-19 hardship and mental health in Chilean parents: the role of disaster exposure and family resilience

2025· article· en· W4408151160 on OpenAlexaff
Camila Espinoza Chaparro, Lenneke R. A. Alink, David P. Laplante, Bernet M. Elzinga, Shelley van der Veek

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Resilience (materials science)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakFamily resiliencePsychologyPsychological resilienceSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Environmental healthPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The negative mental health effects of the pandemic on families are well documented, while factors that buffer or increase such effects still need further investigation. Previous exposure to adversity might increase the negative impact of pandemic experiences. On the other hand, family resilience may protect against these negative effects, and may also be regarded as a mediator explaining the negative association between pandemic hardship and mental health.Objective: The current study focused on the effects of COVID-19-related hardship on parental mental health. We evaluated the impact of the individual experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among Chilean parents from a community sample, who were exposed in varying levels to a destructive earthquake and tsunami approximately 10 years earlier.Method: Participants (N = 219) completed online measures of pandemic hardship, mental health, disaster hardship related to the past earthquake, and family resilience. We examined the moderating role of disaster exposure and the moderating and mediating role of family resilience on the current impact of the pandemic on mental health.Results: Individual exposure levels of COVID-19 hardship were associated with mental health complaints. Both previous disaster hardship and family resilience were associated with mental health complaints. However, previous disaster hardship did not moderate the relationship between pandemic hardship and mental health complaints, nor did family resilience moderate or mediate it.Conclusions: These results align with the evidence of the negative emotional impact of pandemic-related stressors, and propose family resilience and past disaster exposure as relevant predictors of mental health during the sanitary emergency. Findings are discussed in the broader social context in Chile and warrant adjusting public policies towards those underserved groups heavily affected by the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean journal of psychotraumatologySame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207