MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408159446 · doi:10.1038/s44341-025-00012-8

Contractility of striated muscle tissue increases with environmental stiffness according to a power-law relationship

2025· article· en· W4408159446 on OpenAlexaff
Delf Kah, Julia Lell, Tina Wach, Marina Spörrer, Claire A. Dessalles, Julia Kraxner, Sandra Wiedenmann, Richard Gerum, Silvia Vergarajauregui, Tilman U. Esser, David Böhringer, Felix B. Engel, Ingo Thievessen, Ben Fabry

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Biological Physics and Mechanics. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsContractilitySkeletal muscleSarcomereMuscle stiffnessStiffnessMyocyteMuscle contractionStimulationCardiac muscleInternal medicineAnatomyBiophysicsChemistryBiologyMaterials scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The interplay between contractility and mechanosensing in striated muscle is important for tissue morphogenesis, load adaptation, and disease progression, but remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate how contractile force generation in neonatal rat cardiac and C2C12 mouse skeletal muscle micro-tissues depends on environmental stiffness. Micro-tissues self-assemble and mature over one week between flexible elastic pillars with adjustable stiffness that we vary over three orders of magnitude. Contractile forces are measured from pillar deflections and are decomposed into static baseline and transient active forces in response to electrical stimulation. After 3–5 days of maturation, we find that the active, but not static, force of both cardiac and skeletal micro-tissues increases with environmental stiffness according to a strong power-law relationship, indicating a pronounced mechanoresponsiveness. Depleting the focal adhesion protein β-parvin in skeletal muscle miscro-tissues reduces absolute contractile force but does not affect mechanoresponsiveness. Our findings highlight the influence of external stiffness in striated muscle during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Biological Physics and Mechanics.Same topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207