MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408160799 · doi:10.1123/shr.2024-0012

Angelo Mosca and the Semifictionalized Construction of Masculinity: A Gender Discourse Analysis

2025· article· en· W4408160799 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Revington

Bibliographic record

VenueSport History Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityGender studiesSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyzes the life and career of Canadian football star Angelo Mosca, using gender discourse analysis. I argue that Mosca intentionally cultivated an image of “rough” or “tough” masculinity that built on the reputation he gained after a questionable hit in the 1963 Grey Cup game. Mosca transferred the theatricality of professional wrestling to football. He used this exaggerated image of toughness and masculinity to sell products, to the point that he almost became a fictional or legendary character. Moreover, Mosca’s identity became closely tied to the working-class identity of Hamilton, Ontario—the city where he played.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSport History ReviewSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207