Cold storage surpasses the impact of biological age and donor characteristics on red blood cell morphology classified by deep machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assessment of the morphology of red blood cells (RBCs) can improve clinical benefits following blood transfusion. Deep machine learning surpasses traditional microscopy-based classification methods, offering more accurate and consistent results while reducing time and labor intensity. RBCs from teenage males, teenage females, senior males, and senior females were biologically age-profiled or density-separated into dense/old RBCs (O-RBCs) and less-dense/young (Y-RBCs) throughout hypothermic storage and assessed using image flow cytometry with deep machine learning analysis. Regardless of biological age, morphology index decreased with hypothermic storage. Significant differences in RBC morphology index were not seen when comparing unseparated RBCs (U-RBCs), O-RBCs, and Y-RBCs, although the proportions of morphology subclasses revealed differences between RBCs groups from different donor groups and in samples with different biological age. Cold storage remains the most significant influence on morphology, although teenage male donors demonstrated slightly more susceptibility to storage lesions compared with senior males and females. Our work highlights that hypothermic storage most significantly impacts RBC morphology over biological age and donor characteristics, emphasizing the importance of storage effects on transfusion quality and safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".