MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408165785 · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02435-0

The DANA disaster: unraveling the political and economic determinants for Valencia’s floods devastation

2025· article· en· W4408165785 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Gálvez-Hernández, Carles Muntaner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Equity in Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthSocial policyPoliticsPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsEconomic growthSocioeconomicsGeographyEconomicsMedicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On October 29, 2024, the DANA (Depresión Aislada en Niveles Altos) floods devastated the Spanish region of Valencia, resulting in 224 fatalities, extensive infrastructural destruction, and profound physical and mental health impacts. This analysis examines how political neglect, systemic corruption, and historical policy legacies exacerbated the disaster's consequences. Corruption-driven urbanization of flood-prone areas during Spain's real estate boom (1997-2007), coupled with the systematic reduction of critical emergency infrastructure and inadequate emergency response protocols, highlights a political agenda misaligned with public welfare. The political discourse following the disaster has been marked by a lack of accountability, with public outrage culminating in mass protests. As Valencia confronts the aftermath, Spain faces a critical moment to demonstrate whether it can uphold democratic principles, prioritizing public welfare, and addressing the institutional and political-economic deficiencies exposed by the DANA floods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Equity in HealthSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207