Detection of freely moving thoughts using SVM and EEG signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Freely moving thought is a type of thinking that shifts from one topic to another without any overarching direction or aim. The ability to detect when freely moving thought occurs may help us promote its beneficial outcomes, such as for creative thinking and positive mood. Thus far, no studies have used machine learning to detect freely moving thought on the basis of ‘objective’ (e.g. neural or behavioral) data. Approach. Our study addresses this gap, using event-related potential (ERP) and spectral features of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals as well as behavioral measures during a simple attention task and machine learning to detect freely moving thought. EEG features were first examined with both inter-subject and intra-subject strategies. Specifically, the statistical and entropy features of the P3 ERP and alpha spectral measures were entered as inputs to the support vector machine. The best combination of EEG features achieving higher classification performance in both strategies were then selected to combine with behavioral features to further enhance classification performance. Main results. Our best performing model has a Matthew’s correlation coefficient and area under the curve of 0.3105 and 0.6665 for inter-subject models and 0.2815 and 0.6407 for intra-subject models respectively. Significance. The above chance level performance in both strategies using EEG and behavioral features shows great promise for machine learning approaches to detect freely moving thought and highlights their potential for real-time prediction in the real world. This has important implications for enhancing creative processes and mood associated with freely moving thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".