MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408181558 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3549038

Generative-Diffusion-Model-Based Deep-Learning Framework for Remaining Useful Life Prediction

2025· article· en· W4408181558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGenerative grammarGenerative modelMachine learningData modelingDiffusionDeep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose a novel and high-performing deep learning framework for remaining useful life (RUL) prediction, called RUL-Diff, by leveraging a generative diffusion model. It is composed of two modules that are connected in tandem: 1) a feature extractor corresponding to the encoder part of our customized U-Net and 2) a RUL predictor constructed by a multilayer perceptron. We further devise an effective two-stage training methodology for the proposed RUL-Diff, in which the feature extractor is initially pretrained for high-quality feature learning, and then, is retrained jointly with the RUL predictor for accurate RUL prediction. Extensive experimental results on NASA Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS) datasets demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it