MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408182934 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3546877

Substrate Integrated Waveguide-Based Liquid Sensor With Self-Calibration Capability

2025· article· en· W4408182934 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali‐Reza Moznebi, Hamidreza Laribi, Kambiz Moez, Rashid Mirzavand

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCalibrationWaveguideSubstrate (aquarium)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsIntegrated opticsOpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a microwave sensor for liquid permittivity measurement, using substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) resonators. The proposed design consists of two SIW cavities linked via an iris window, with two microstrip ports connected to the upper SIW cavity through a grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW) transition. To enable sensitivity to permittivity variation, seven rectangular holes are etched into the iris between the cavities. The sensor exhibits a dual-band response: the first band is sensitive to changes in hole permittivity, making it suitable for liquid permittivity detection, while the second band remains fixed and serves as a reference to compensate for environmental variations. The self-calibration mechanism is achieved by comparing the two bands, which ensures that any environmental changes are compensated. The sensor was designed for the ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band and validated using ethanol-water mixtures as test liquids. The measured results show that the first resonant frequency shifts from 903.3 to 910.5 MHz as the ethanol volume fraction increases from 0% to 100%. The proposed sensor is highly promising for direct radio frequency (RF) sensing applications because of its environmental interference resistance, ease of integration with other planar circuits, simple design, low-cost fabrication, and enclosed structure, making it ideal for direct liquid contact applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207