Wave-Medium Interactions in Dynamic Matter and Modulation Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Space-time modulation systems have recently garnered significant attention due to their resemblance to moving-matter systems, unique properties, and promising applications. Unlike conventional moving-matter systems, modulation systems do not involve any net motion of matter and are therefore easier to implement and capable to attain relativistic and superluminal velocities. However, the fundamental wave-medium interaction aspects in such media, such as scattering and energy-momentum relations, have been essentially unexplored to date. In this article, we fill this gap, considering three dynamic systems: moving-matter blocs, moving-perturbation interfaces, and moving-perturbation truncated periodic structures, and provide corresponding general formulations along with comparisons. Our investigation reveals significant roles played by the “pushing” and “pulling” effects of the moving interface onto the wave in such systems. Moreover, it describes different energy and momentum transfers between moving media and homogenized moving-perturbation structures that result from conventional and reverse Fresnel-Fizeau drag effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it