MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408185788 · doi:10.1007/s00063-025-01254-z

Kinder und Jugendliche in deutschen Notaufnahmen

2025· article· de· W4408185788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alina Balandin, Susanne Drynda, Gunnar Elke, Ronny Otto, Domagoj Schunk

Bibliographic record

VenueMedizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The planned hospital and emergency care reform in Germany aims, among other things, to restructure emergency services towards integrated emergency centers (INZ) and integrated emergency centers for children and adolescents (KINZ). There is a gap in current data on the reasons for presentation and the use of emergency departments by patients under 18 years of age. This study provides a multicenter analysis of the most common reasons for presentation among children and adolescents in German emergency departments. METHODS: In a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional analysis, data were collected from 251,570 emergency patients under 18 years of age from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022, across 22 emergency departments (including three pediatric emergency departments). Reasons for presentation were categorized according to the Canadian Emergency Department Information System-Presenting Complaint List (CEDIS-PCL) and analyzed by age group, gender, and mode of arrival. RESULTS: Over 64.1% of children and adolescents presented with one of the ten most common reasons. In pediatric emergency departments, nontrauma-related reasons, such as respiratory infections and abdominal pain, were predominant, while trauma-related reasons were more frequent in general emergency departments. The gender distribution showed a majority of male patients for trauma-related reasons, whereas some nontrauma-related reasons, like abdominal and headache complaints, were more common among females. Most patients (85.5%) arrived at the emergency department independently; only for seizures did ambulance transport prevail. During the day, 67% of patients presented between 06:00 and 18:00, with 33% presenting in the evening and nighttime hours. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that more than half of children and adolescents present to emergency departments with one of the ten most common chief complaints. Notably, nontraumatological presentations in emergency departments (EDs) highlight that pediatric care also takes place in facilities primarily serving adults. In the future, staff and infrastructure should be appropriately equipped to efficiently ensure the quality of pediatric emergency care on a broad scale. An important approach in this regard is health education and the optimization of access to outpatient care structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin→Same topicEmergency and Acute Care Studies→French-language works237,207→