MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408186005 · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2025.03.004

Two-dimensional (2D) material nanofiltration membranes for effective recovery of lithium

2025· article· en· W4408186005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofiltrationMembraneLithium (medication)Materials scienceChromatographyChemical engineeringChemistryEngineeringMedicineBiochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the consistent increase in global demand for renewable energy, microelectronics, and electric vehicles, the demand for lithium has surged drastically in recent years to ensure sustainable growth of respective sectors. Recovery of lithium particularly from seawater has emerged as a cutting-edge technology to strengthen lithium resources. Since the innovation of two-dimensional (2D) materials, 2D materials-driven nanofiltration (NF) membranes have been on the top priority for lithium recovery, mainly due to their cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency. The most phenomenal aspect associated with 2D materials nanofiltration process is that exceptional ions and water permeation phenomena have been attained. These results are achieved mainly due to the existence of a synergistic effect between controlled pore size (stacking space available between adjacent layers) and surface properties of nanopores/nanochannels developed in membranes. In this review report, we have outlined and discussed various 2D materials including graphene, graphene oxide (GO), MXene (Ti 3 C 2 X), hexagonal-boron nitride (h-BN), metal–organic framework, metal covalent framework, and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) deployed for construction of nanofiltration membranes along with their attained monovalent metal ions rejection outcomes, Li + ions in particular. Various strategies (i.e., defect engineering, cation regulations, and modification of surface functional groups) have been explained in detail in order to create nanopores into nanosheets and to tune the interlayer spacing of 2D nanofiltration membranes. Moreover, 2D materials composite nanofiltration membranes with improved metal ion rejection rates, hydrophobicity, enhanced structural integrity in varied pH solutions, and non-swelling characteristics have also been discussed. Finally, to promote the development of 2D materials-driven nanofiltration membranes with further enhanced lithium-ion recovery rates, rational design of membrane structures, relevant challenges, and future perspectives are insightfully addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it