MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408196376 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22024-8

Generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder among healthcare professionals in Mbarara city, southwestern Uganda: the relationship with professional quality of life and resilience

2025· article· en· W4408196376 on OpenAlexaff
Joan Abaatyo, Alain Favina, Margaret Twine, Dan Lutasingwa, Rosemary Ricciardelli, Godfrey Zari Rukundo

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneralized anxiety disorderQuality of life (healthcare)Major depressive disorderPsychological resilienceMental healthPsychiatryPublic healthClinical psychologyAnxietyHealth careEmpathyCompassion fatiguePsychologyNursingBurnoutMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Marking the lives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are tensions arising from the conflict between fulfilling their duty of care and the demands of the healthcare setting, creating concern for HCPs' mental. In our study, we aim to determine the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) among HCPs in Southwestern Uganda and to establish how the disorders' prevalence affects professional quality of life and resilience. METHOD: In total, 200 HCPs from two health facilities (one private and one public) in Southwestern Uganda enrolled in an analytical cross-sectional study. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to determine MDD, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to determine GAD, the Professional Quality of Life Scale-5 (ProQOL-5) to determine professional quality of life and the Nicholson McBride Resilience Questionnaire (NMRQ) to determine resilience. RESULTS: The prevalence of MDD was 11.0% and of GAD was 14.5%. High compassion fatigue increased the likelihood of MDD [aPR = 3.38, p value < 0.001]. However, high compassion satisfaction and exceptional resilience reduced the likelihood of GAD i.e., [aPR = 0.50, p value < 0.001] and [aPR = 0.50, p value < 0.001] respectively. Being male [aPR = 2.41, p value = 0.005] and being married [aPR = 1.79, p value = 0.017] increased the likelihood of having MDD. The likelihood of GAD among HCPs decreased with age, [aPR = 0.97, p value = 0.022]. CONCLUSION: There is a significant occurrence of MDD and GAD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Southwestern Uganda. Compassion fatigue is linked to an elevated prevalence of MDD, while compassion satisfaction and high resilience scores are associated with a reduced prevalence of GAD. We recommend creation and execution of extensive mental health initiatives designed for HCPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout→French-language works237,207→