MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408198270 · doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000001167

Recent advances in asthma mucus biology and emerging treatment strategies

2025· review· en· W4408198270 on OpenAlexaff
С. В. Федосенко, Carmen Venegas Garrido, Parameswaran Nair

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaMucusIntensive care medicineMEDLINEImmunologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the recent advances in the pathobiology and treatment of mucus hypersecretion in asthma, a critical factor contributing to airway obstruction, inflammation, and impaired lung function. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant progress has been made in understanding how mucin protein regulation, mucus viscosity, and adhesion are affected by cytokine-driven inflammation, especially interleukin-13, and defects in ion transport mechanisms. Advances in imaging techniques, such as multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and hyperpolarized gas MRI, allow for a more precise assessment of mucus plugging and associated ventilation defects. Emerging therapies, including biologicals targeting type-2 (T2) inflammation, and novel mucolytics aimed at modifying mucus properties and secretion, offer promising effects in reducing mucus in severe asthmatics. SUMMARY: The growing understanding of mucus biology and the development of advanced imaging and therapeutic strategies could significantly improve the management of mucus-related complications in asthma. By targeting mucus characteristics, these findings support future approaches to reduce airway obstruction, enhance lung function, and improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe asthma. A deeper understanding of the glycobiology of mucus is critical to develop new therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary MedicineSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207