Slik sculpts the plasma membrane into cytonemes to control cell-cell communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytonemes are signaling filopodia that facilitate long-range cell-cell communication by forming synapses between cells. Initially discovered in Drosophila for transporting morphogens during embryogenesis, they have since been identified in mammalian cells and implicated in carcinogenesis. Despite their importance, mechanisms controlling cytoneme biogenesis remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the Ser/Thr kinase Slik drives remote cell proliferation by promoting cytoneme formation. This function depends on the coiled-coil domain of Slik (SlikCCD), which directly sculpts membranes into tubules. Importantly, Slik plays opposing roles in cytoneme biogenesis: its membrane-sculpting activity promotes cytoneme formation, but this is counteracted by its kinase activity, which enhances actin association with the plasma membrane via Moesin phosphorylation. In vivo, SlikCCD enhances cytoneme formation in one epithelial layer of the wing disc to promote cell proliferation in an adjacent layer. Finally, this function relies on the STRIPAK complex, which controls cytoneme formation and governs proliferation at a distance by regulating Slik association with the plasma membrane. Our study unveils an unexpected structural role of a kinase in sculpting membranes, crucial for cytoneme-mediated control of cell proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".