Self-CephaloNet: a two-stage novel framework using operational neural network for cephalometric analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cephalometric analysis is essential for the diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics. In lateral cephalograms, however, the manual detection of anatomical landmarks is a time-consuming procedure. Deep learning solutions hold the potential to address the time constraints associated with certain tasks; however, concerns regarding their performances have been observed. To address this critical issue, we propose an end-to-end cascaded deep learning framework (Self-CephaloNet) for the task, which demonstrates benchmark performance over the ISBI 2015 dataset in predicting 19 cephalometric landmarks. Due to their adaptive nodal capabilities, Self-ONN (self-operational neural networks) demonstrates superior learning performance for complex feature spaces over conventional convolutional neural networks. To leverage this attribute, we introduce a novel self-bottleneck in the HRNetV2 (high-resolution network) backbone, which has exhibited benchmark performance on our landmark detection task. Our first-stage result surpasses previous studies, showcasing the efficacy of our singular end-to-end deep learning model, which achieves a remarkable 70.95% success rate in detecting cephalometric landmarks within a 2-mm range for the Test1 and Test2 datasets which are part of ISBI 2015 dataset. Moreover, the second stage significantly improves overall performance, yielding an impressive 82.25% average success rate for the datasets above within the same 2-mm distance. Furthermore, external validation has been conducted using the PKU cephalogram dataset. Our model demonstrates a commendable success rate of 75.95% within the 2-mm range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".